Analysis Summary:

The article's central claim about the amount spent on $TRUMP coin to secure a dinner invite is plausible but lacks direct verification from the provided sources. While the existence of the coin and Trump's offer of a dinner are supported, the specific $140 million figure is not. The article exhibits moderate bias through its focus on a controversial figure and speculative financial activity.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** The top holders of the $TRUMP meme coin spent from $53,400 to $16.4 million each to get a dinner invitation with President Trump.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that Trump offered the top 220 holders of the coin an “intimate private dinner”.
  • Verification Source #1: Mentions Trump's meme coin and its fluctuating value, implying its existence and relevance.
  • Verification Source #3, #4, and #5: Do not cover this specific claim.
  • Internal Knowledge:* It is plausible that individuals spent significant amounts on the coin, given the volatile nature of meme coins and the potential for perceived value based on association with Trump. However, the exact figures ($53,400 to $16.4 million and the aggregate $140 million) are not directly verified by the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2: Supports the existence of the dinner invitation offer.
• Verification Source #1: Supports the existence and fluctuating value of the $TRUMP coin.
• The lack of direct verification for the $140 million figure and the individual spending ranges constitutes a significant gap in factual accuracy. The provided sources do not contradict this claim, but their silence necessitates a lower accuracy score.