Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the claim of growing resistance against the Trump administration is supported by some sources, the lack of a unified message or strategy is also acknowledged. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on resistance efforts, potentially downplaying opposing viewpoints or the administration's perspective.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Despite lacking a unified message or strategy, Democrats, universities, law firms and other institutions are starting to push back harder against the administration."
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the idea that there is "no centralized movement to organize the anti-Trump resistance."
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the idea of conflict between Trump and perceived progressive values, particularly in California.
• Fail to cover:* The specific claim about law firms. Requires internal knowledge or additional sources for verification.
• Fail to cover:* The specific claim about "other institutions." Requires internal knowledge or additional sources for verification.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #4: "There has been no centralized movement to organize the anti-Trump resistance." This supports the claim that the resistance lacks a unified message or strategy.
• Verification Source #3: "Donald Trump does not hide his disdain for California and its perceived progressive values. Now UC Berkeley analysts say he may be planning a sharp extended conflict with California experts say." This supports the idea of conflict and resistance against the Trump administration.
• The provided sources do not offer specific evidence about law firms or other institutions pushing back, indicating a gap in coverage.