Analysis Summary:

The article's claim that Trump's tariff threats led to negotiations with some countries while causing chaos with others is partially supported by the provided sources. The claim of "global chaos" is subjective but aligns with concerns raised about potential disruptions. The article exhibits moderate bias through its framing and word choice, particularly in describing the effects of the tariffs.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The president’s threats of tariffs have brought countries like Japan, South Korea and India rushing to negotiate..."
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions Trump touting trade talk progress, suggesting other countries want to make deals. This indirectly supports the claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions international agreements being in peril, which could prompt countries to negotiate.
• Verdict:* Partially supported.

• Claim:** "...but they have sown chaos with bigger trading partners like China."
  • Verification Source #4: States that tariffs on all imports would create chaos for business. This supports the potential for chaos.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions the chaotic trade policies of the Trump administration.
• Verdict:* Supported.

• Claim:** "Tariffs Sow Global Chaos" (from the title).
  • Verification Source #4: Specifically mentions "chaos for business" due to tariffs.
  • Verification Source #5: Refers to "chaotic trade" policies.
• Verdict:* Supported, although "global chaos" is a strong and potentially exaggerated term.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2: "Trump gives update on trade talks: Other countries want to make a deal 'more than I do'." This supports the idea that countries are negotiating.
• Verification Source #4: "But the near-term damage will be even greater if massive disruptions in supply chains create chaos for businesses that rely on imports." This supports the claim of potential chaos.
• Verification Source #5: "Fewer still will invest if the Trump administration pairs its chaotic trade..." This also supports the claim of chaotic trade policies.
• The sources do not explicitly contradict the claims, but the level of "chaos" is subjective and potentially overstated. The sources focus on potential or realized negative impacts, suggesting a bias against the tariff policies.