Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While it suggests a shift in Trump's stance on Russia and Ukraine, the provided sources offer some support but also highlight potential bias. The claim about "doing business deals" is not directly supported by the provided sources, making it difficult to verify.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "In a reversal, President Trump appears to have backed off joining a European push for new sanctions on Russia..."
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the idea that Trump's stance on the Russia-Ukraine war is a significant concern.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the idea that Trump has a Russia-friendly position on the war in Ukraine.
  • Verification Source #5: Agrees that Trump's return is bad news for Ukraine.
• Analysis:* The sources generally support the idea of a shift in Trump's stance, but don't specifically mention him "backing off joining a European push for new sanctions."
• Claim:** "...seemingly eager to move on to doing business deals with it."
• Analysis:* None of the provided sources directly mention Trump being "eager to move on to doing business deals with" Russia. This claim is unverified by the provided sources. This could be inferred from his Russia-friendly position, but it is not explicitly stated.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1, #3, and #5 all agree that Trump's stance on Russia and Ukraine is a significant issue.
• Lack of Coverage:** The claim about Trump being "eager to move on to doing business deals" is not covered by any of the provided sources.
• Potential Bias:** The NY Times article uses the word "reversal" and "seemingly eager," which could indicate a negative slant towards Trump's actions.