Two Quit Human Rights Watch Over Shelved Report Criticizing Israel
Two Quit Human Rights Watch Over Shelved Report Criticizing Israel
Omar Shakir and Milena Ansari said they had quit over the stalled publication of a report that concludes it is a crime against humanity to deny Palestinians the right of return to the territory that is now Israel.
Read the full article on NY Times World
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's central claim about the resignations over a shelved report is supported by one source, but the NY Times article itself is not directly verifiable through the provided sources. The article presents a potentially biased view by focusing on criticism of Israel without providing counter-arguments or broader context. The date of the NY Times article (2026) raises a red flag, suggesting a potential fabrication or error.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Two individuals, Omar Shakir and Milena Ansari, quit Human Rights Watch over a shelved report criticizing Israel.
- Verification Source #2: Confirms that the Israel-Palestine director at Human Rights Watch resigned over the decision to spike a report.
- Assessment: Supported by source 2. However, the names of the individuals are not explicitly confirmed by this source.
- Claim: The shelved report concludes that denying Palestinians the right of return to the territory that is now Israel is a crime against humanity.
- Verification Source #2: Confirms the report's conclusion regarding Israel's denial of the right of return.
- Assessment: Supported by source 2.
- Claim: The NY Times published this article on February 4, 2026.
- Assessment: Unverifiable. The date is in the future, raising concerns about the article's authenticity or a typo.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 2 supports the claim that a report criticizing Israel was shelved and led to a resignation within Human Rights Watch.
- The date of the NY Times article (2026) is problematic and casts doubt on the article's validity.