Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. The core claim about a potential US-UK trade deal announcement is plausible, but the attribution of the "major trade deal" quote solely to Trump is potentially misleading. The article exhibits moderate bias by framing the deal in the context of Trump's rhetoric without providing alternative perspectives.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "The U.S. and U.K. are expected to announce what President Trump has called a "major trade deal" that's "full and comprehensive."
• Verification Source #1: Does not cover this specific claim, but mentions Trump using strong language ("insane," "ridiculous") regarding the Iran deal, which suggests a pattern of using strong adjectives.
• Verification Source #3: Mentions Ackman calling Trump's tariffs "economic nuclear war," further illustrating Trump's tendency to use strong language in trade contexts.
• Verification Source #2, #4, #5: Do not cover this claim.
• Internal Knowledge:* It is plausible that Trump used the phrase "major trade deal" to describe a potential US-UK agreement, given his past rhetoric on trade. However, attributing the entire phrase solely to him without further context could be biased. It's possible others have used similar language. The article doesn't provide direct evidence of Trump using that exact phrase for this specific deal.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1 and #3 support the idea that Trump used strong language when discussing trade-related topics. However, none of the provided sources directly confirm that Trump used the exact phrase "major trade deal" specifically in relation to a US-UK agreement. This lack of direct confirmation lowers the factual accuracy score. The framing of the deal solely through Trump's words introduces a moderate bias.