Analysis Summary:

The article's claim of "panic-buying" is difficult to verify with the provided sources. While one source mentions "panic buying" in a different context (Verification Source #3), none directly support the claim related to K-beauty products due to tariffs. The title and framing suggest a bias towards portraying negative economic consequences of Trump's policies.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** U.S. consumers are "panic-buying" K-beauty products amid Trump's tariff war.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions "panic buying" in the context of motorists and fuel, not K-beauty products. Fails to support the claim.
  • Verification Source #1 and #2: Do not cover the topic of K-beauty products, tariffs, or consumer behavior.
  • Internal Knowledge:* It is plausible that tariffs could influence consumer behavior, but without specific data or sources, the claim of "panic-buying" is speculative.
• Claim:** Almost all of the serums, face masks and creams sold at Senti Senti, a Brooklyn skincare store, are imported from South Korea and Japan.
  • Internal Knowledge:* This is a specific detail about a particular store. Without external verification, it's difficult to confirm its accuracy. The provided sources do not cover this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #3: Mentions "panic buying" but in an unrelated context (fuel).
• Verification Source #1 and #2: Do not provide any relevant information to support or contradict the article's claims.
• The lack of supporting evidence for the "panic-buying" claim suggests a potential exaggeration or misrepresentation of the situation.