Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. While the general premise of military parades existing in various types of regimes is likely true, the provided snippet focuses on a specific proposed US parade and its timing, which is difficult to verify with the given sources. The article exhibits moderate bias by framing the parade as an "outlier" and associating it with Trump's birthday, potentially creating a negative connotation.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The military parade to mark the Army’s 250th anniversary and its convergence with President Donald Trump’s 79th birthday are combining to create a peacetime outlier in U.S. history."
• This claim is difficult to verify with the provided sources. None of the sources directly address the proposed parade, its timing, or its historical context within the US. The claim that it is a "peacetime outlier" is an interpretation that could be considered biased.
• Verification Source #1-5: Fail to cover.*
• Internal Knowledge:* Without specific historical data on US military parades, it's difficult to assess the accuracy of the "outlier" claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not directly support or contradict the specific claim about the US military parade.
• Verification Source #1:* Discusses the breakdown of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism, which is relevant to the broader context of the article's title but doesn't address the specific claim.
• Verification Source #2:* Defines authoritarianism, which is relevant to the article's title but doesn't address the specific claim.
• Verification Source #3:* Discusses the Iranian Revolution, which is relevant to the broader context of the article's title but doesn't address the specific claim.
• Verification Source #4:* Provides basic information about North Korea, which is relevant to the broader context of the article's title but doesn't address the specific claim.
• Verification Source #5:* Provides information about the Danish government, which is relevant to the broader context of the article's title but doesn't address the specific claim.