Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources, although the snippet is very short. The claim that Victory Day events in occupied territories are meant to show Russian control is plausible and aligns with the general context of the conflict. There is a slight bias in framing the events as a demonstration of "Russian control," which could be interpreted differently.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Events to mark the holiday in the occupied territories seem to be an effort to show Russian control of land it has captured.
  • Verification Source #1: Does not directly address events in occupied territories but discusses Putin's attempts to justify the invasion, which lends indirect support to the idea of demonstrating control.
  • Verification Source #2: Does not cover this specific claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Does not cover this specific claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Does not cover this specific claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions muted celebrations in Ukraine due to the war, providing context for the situation in occupied territories.
  • Internal Knowledge:* Given Russia's actions in occupied territories, it is plausible that Victory Day events are used to project control.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not directly confirm or deny the claim about Victory Day events in occupied territories being a show of Russian control. However, Verification Source #1 discusses Putin's attempts to justify the invasion, which aligns with the idea of projecting control. Verification Source #5 mentions muted celebrations in Ukraine, providing context.
• The lack of direct coverage in the provided sources is a limitation. Internal knowledge suggests the claim is plausible, but without specific verification, the accuracy cannot be definitively confirmed.