Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. It accurately states that CCTV and phone recordings were shown in court. However, the snippet implies Erin Patterson was found guilty of murder, which is contradicted by some sources that state she is *on trial* for murder. The reporting appears relatively neutral, with a slight slant towards presenting evidence shown in court.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Evidence shown in the trial of Erin Patterson has been shared by authorities.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that phone tower expert testimony and CCTV footage were presented.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that CCTV images and phone records were shown in court.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that CCTV footage from a Subway restaurant was shown to the court.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that CCTV footage from a service station was shown to the court and that phone location data was presented.
• This claim is generally supported by multiple sources.
• Claim:** Erin Patterson was found guilty of murder.
  • Verification Source #3: Contradicts this claim, stating that Patterson is *on trial* for murder.
• This claim is contradicted by at least one source.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Multiple sources (Verification Source #1, Verification Source #2, Verification Source #4, Verification Source #5) agree that CCTV footage and phone records were presented as evidence in the trial.
• Contradiction:** Verification Source #3 contradicts the implication that Erin Patterson has already been found guilty of murder, stating that she is currently on trial.