Watch: Moment pet lion pounces on woman in street

Watch: Moment pet lion pounces on woman in street

CCTV footage shows the moment a lion leaps over a concrete wall before attacking a woman.

Truth Analysis

Factual Accuracy
4/5
Bias Level
4/5
Analysis Summary:

The BBC article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The core claim of a pet lion attacking a woman is supported by multiple sources. There is minimal bias, presenting the event in a straightforward manner.

Detailed Analysis:
  • Claim:** CCTV footage shows the moment a lion leaps over a concrete wall before attacking a woman.
    • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, mentioning the footage.
    • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, mentioning the footage.
    • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.
  • Claim:** The incident occurred in Pakistan.
    • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, mentioning the owners were arrested in Pakistan.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, mentioning the owners were arrested in Pakistan.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, mentioning the incident occurred in Lahore, Pakistan.
    • Verification Source #4: *Fails to cover* this claim directly, but implies it through the context of the article.
    • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.
  • Claim:** The lion was a pet.
    • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
  • All sources agree that a pet lion attacked a woman in Pakistan, and that CCTV footage captured the event.
  • Verification Source #3 and #4 mention that the lion also chased two children. The original BBC article snippet does not mention the children, which is a minor omission, but not a contradiction.
  • Verification Source #1 and #2 are the same article.