Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the limited information available in the snippet and the provided verification sources. The claim about starkly different policies is plausible given the political landscape, but the snippet is too short to fully assess. There's a moderate bias towards highlighting climate change concerns, which is expected given the NY Times' general stance and the article's title.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The leading candidates in Saturday’s national election have starkly different policies on energy and global warming."
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the general idea that the election policies will shape the future of climate action in Australia.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions the Liberal Party's plan for a stronger economy, implying a different approach than other parties, but doesn't directly address climate policies.
  • Verification Source #1: Highlights the need to reduce emissions from coal and gas, suggesting climate change is a key issue.
• Analysis:* The claim is plausible and generally supported by the sources, which indicate differing approaches to climate and energy. However, without knowing the specific policies of the leading candidates, it's impossible to verify the "starkly different" aspect definitively based on the provided snippet and sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #3: "Climate change and the Federal Election: everything you need to know..." This suggests that climate change is a significant issue in the election, supporting the claim that candidates have policies on the matter.
• Verification Source #1: "...coal and gas are all required to tackle the climate..." This highlights the importance of energy policy in addressing climate change, further supporting the claim.
• Verification Source #2: Focuses on economic strength, suggesting a potentially different priority than climate action for the Liberal Party. This indirectly supports the idea of differing policies.
• Lack of Coverage:* None of the sources provide a direct comparison of the specific climate policies of the leading candidates.