Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the general premise of Trump altering deals with law firms and universities is supported, the specific details and implications require further verification. There's a moderate bias, potentially stemming from selective reporting or framing of the situation.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Trump altered the deal with law firms and universities.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that Trump has attacked law firms.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that a law firm (Paul Weiss) has a deal with Trump.
  • Verification Source #4: Mentions Trump administration's impact on judicial norms.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions Trump, law firms, and universities.
• Verdict:* Supported by multiple sources.
• Claim:** The prisoner's dilemma applies when the rules break down.
• Verdict:* This is a theoretical question and not a factual claim that can be verified by the provided sources. It's more of an introductory statement.
• Claim:** (Implied) The alteration of deals has significant consequences.
  • Verification Source #2: Suggests potential blowback for Paul Weiss.
• Verdict:* Partially supported, but the extent of the consequences is not fully verifiable from the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 and #2 both confirm Trump's involvement with law firms, either through attacks or deals.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific details of the "deal" and how Trump "altered" it are not explicitly detailed in the provided snippets.
• Lack of Coverage:** The impact on universities is only indirectly mentioned.
• Internal Knowledge:** The prisoner's dilemma is a game theory concept.