Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the general premise of Oklahoma farmers adopting conservation practices is plausible, the specific claim of reviving "about 100 streams" lacks direct verification from the provided sources. The title's focus on "cows using a different washroom" suggests a specific practice, but the snippet provided is too short to assess its accuracy or how it relates to the broader claim. There's a moderate bias towards highlighting positive environmental outcomes.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Oklahoma farmers have adopted conservation practices.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the general idea of conservation practices in cattle farming, mentioning clean water tanks.
  • Verification Source #5: Provides a way to report environmental violations, implying that environmental issues and regulations exist.
• Analysis: This claim is generally supported by the sources, but the extent and specific practices are not detailed.
• Claim:** These practices have helped to revive about 100 streams.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: *Fail to cover* this specific claim.
• Analysis: This is a significant claim that lacks direct verification from the provided sources. It's impossible to confirm the number of streams revived based on the given information.
• Claim:** Haunted by memories of the Dust Bowl.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: *Fail to cover* this claim.
• Analysis: This is a plausible statement given Oklahoma's history, but it's not verifiable with the provided sources. Internal knowledge suggests this is a reasonable historical context.
• Claim:** Getting Cows to Use a Different Washroom.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: *Fail to cover* this claim.
• Analysis: This claim is not verifiable with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: Supports the idea of clean water practices in cattle farming, which could contribute to stream health.
• Verification Source #5: Provides a mechanism for reporting environmental violations, suggesting that environmental issues exist and are monitored.
• The lack of coverage for the specific claim of "reviving about 100 streams" is a significant gap in verification.