Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mostly sound, with the primary claim of India accusing Pakistan of supporting terrorist groups being verifiable. However, the article presents a potential bias by simply stating Pakistan's rejection without further context or analysis. The provided sources generally support the events described, but some details regarding the specifics of the strikes and their impact are not fully covered.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** India has accused Pakistan of continuing to support Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim by stating India targeted sites with "terrorist infrastructure."
  • Verification Source #1: Implies this claim by mentioning India's claim of "targeting terrorist camps."
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim by mentioning India's stated targets of groups associated with terrorism.
• Claim:** Pakistan has rejected those claims.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim by stating Pakistan says it has nothing to do with the attacks.
  • Verification Source #2: Does not directly address this claim, but mentions the Pakistani military's response.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim by stating that Pakistan's leadership denied the claims.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All sources generally agree that India conducted strikes and claimed to target terrorist infrastructure or camps. Verification Source #5, Verification Source #1, and Verification Source #3 all support this.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #5 both confirm that Pakistan rejected India's claims.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific details of the support India alleges Pakistan provides to these groups are not detailed in the provided sources.
• Potential Bias:** The article simply states Pakistan's rejection without providing any context or analysis of their reasons or evidence. This could be seen as a slight bias, as it doesn't offer a balanced perspective.