Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is low due to the lack of verification sources covering the core claims. The provided sources do not address the White House's reaction to Amazon's tariff fee display or Amazon's plans regarding it. The article exhibits moderate bias by presenting the White House's perspective without sufficient context or alternative viewpoints.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** White House calls Amazon tariff fee display "hostile and political."
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Fails to cover this claim.
• This claim cannot be verified with the provided sources.
• Claim:** Amazon said it had considered listing import charges on some products, but said the idea wasn't approved and won't happen.
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Fails to cover this claim.
• This claim cannot be verified with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer any supporting evidence or contradictions for the claims made in the article.
• Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #2 are irrelevant to the claims made in the article.