Analysis Summary:

The article's main claim about smaller parties potentially impacting local elections seems plausible, though the provided snippet is too short to fully assess the article's accuracy. The snippet itself is verifiable through the provided sources. There's a slight bias towards the idea that major parties are likely to suffer, which could be interpreted as a negative framing.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Slivers" of votes are set to decide the local elections - with the big parties likely to suffer.
  • Verification Source #1 and #2: Support this claim, as they are the same article and contain the same snippet.
  • Verification Source #3, #4, and #5: Do not directly address this claim, focusing instead on voter registration and third-party voting effectiveness.
  • Internal Knowledge:* Without the full article, it's difficult to assess the context and supporting evidence for this claim. It's a plausible scenario in many electoral systems, but the degree to which it's happening and the reasons behind it are not verifiable based on the snippet and supplemental sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1 and #2: The snippet directly supports the claim.
• Verification Source #3, #4, and #5: Do not provide evidence for or against the claim, as they cover different topics.
• Internal Knowledge:* The claim aligns with general trends in some democracies where smaller parties gain traction due to dissatisfaction with major parties, but this is not verifiable without the full article.